Md. Arman @ Mahammad Arman v. State Of West Bengal

18.06.2025 Item No.10 Ct.No.34 rc.

C.R.M. (M) 423 of 2025 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, in connection with Goalpokher Police Station Case No. 530 of 2023 dated 21.09.2023.

And In Re :

Md. Arman @ Mohammad Arman ... Petitioner Mr. Ashok Das Mr. Imdadul Hoque Ms. Hasi Jana ... for the Petitioner Mr. Debasish Roy Mr. Avishek Sinha Ms. Puja Goswami ... for the State The petitioner is in custody for more than a year and prays for bail.

Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer. I have perused the material on record. The petitioner appears to be a co-conspirator who was allegedly involved in the murder of the victim along with the co-accused. The prosecution proposes to examine seven more witnesses. Learned counsel for the State submits that examination of witnesses shall be concluded in another two months subject to cooperation by the accused and systemic reasons. Considering the material on record prima facie connecting the petitioner to the alleged offence as well as submission made on behalf of the State, prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

The learned trial Court is directed to take the proceedings to its logical conclusion as expeditiously as possible, without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties, in accordance with law in the light of the submission made on behalf of the State.

The bail application is disposed of.

Case Diary is returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)