Tinku Dinda v. State Of West Bengal

10.06.2022.

68.

Ct.No.28.

as (Allowed) C.R.M. (DB) 1576 of 2022 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Nandakumar P. S. Case No.113 of 2020 dated 22.03.2020 under Sections 341/323/326A/354/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. In the matter of : Tinku Dinda.

.... Petitioner.

Mr. Amal Krishna Samanta.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Anowar Hossain, Ms. Ratna Ghosh.

...for the State.

Heard the learned Counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.

Petitioner is in custody for about 80 days. It is submitted that there case and counter case between the parties. Petitioner contends he is not the principal accused. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

We have considered the materials on record and keeping in mind the nature of allegations in the light of the aforesaid submission made on behalf of the petitioner and the period of detention suffered by him, we are inclined in granting bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Purba Medinipur subject

to condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the Trial Court without any justifiable cause, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

This application for bail is, thus, disposed of. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)