← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/4630/2021rejected

Mustak Mahammad@Chand@Sk Mustak Mohammad v. Union Of India

2021-11-16Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Honble Justice Ananda Kumar Mukherjee2 pages

16.11.2021 Serial no. 45 Dd (Through Video Conference) CRM 4630 of 2021 In re : An Application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with NDPS Case No. 15 of 2013 (T.R. No. 15/2013) arising out of NCB Crime No. 13//NCB/KOL/2013 under Section 20(b) (ii)(C)/29 of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substance Act, 1985.

-AndIn the matter of : Mustak Mahammad @ Chand @ Sk Mustak Mohammad ... ...Petitioner Ms. Minoti Gomes, Ms. Manasi Roy, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Y. J. Dastoor, Learned ASG Mr. Phiroze Edulji, Ms. Sumitra Das, Advocates ... ...For the NCB Petitioner seeks anticipatory bail.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that no contraband was recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner was falsely implicated on the basis of a statement of the co-accused. She submits that she was not aware of the proceeding initiated by the Narcotic Control Bureau (NCB) against the petitioner.

Learned Additional Solicitor General draws the attention of the Court to the contents in the case diary. He submits that notices under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, 1985 was sent at least thrice commencing from August 27, 2013. The petitioner did not respond to such notices. After much ado the NCB persuaded the jurisdictional Court to

segregate the petitioner from the two other co-accused and proceed against the two other co-accused. Two witnesses were examined before the jurisdictional Court. He opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the materials in the case diary, the complicity of the petitioner in the incident and the fact that the petitioner did not respond to the notices issued under Section 67 of the NDPS Act, 1985 and considering the fact that warrant of arrest was issued against the petitioner, we are not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.

CRM 4630 of 2021 is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.)