← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/2635/2022allowed

Mukul Sil And ANR v. State Of West Bengal

2022-06-13Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay1 pages

13.06.2022 tkm/ct 28 C.R.M. (A) 2635 of 2022 sl no. 162 In Re : An application for anticipatory bail under section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Dhantala P.S case no. 310 of 2022 dated 14.5.2022 under sections 447/323/325/307/354B/34 IPC And Allowed In Re : Mukul Sil & Anr.

...... petitioners Ms. S Bhattacharyya ...... for the petitioner Mr. Arijit Ganguly Ms. M Sharma ...... for the State It is submitted that there was a scuffle amongst the family members. Petitioner no. 2 was assaulted and criminal case was registered. In retaliation, the present case has been registered. Learned lawyer for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

We have considered materials on record in the light of the aforesaid submissions made on behalf of the petitioners. Nature of injury as noted in the medical papers do not appear to be grievous.

In view of the aforesaid facts, we are inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

Petitioners shall appear before the court below and prays for regular bail within four weeks from date.

The application being CRM (A) 2635 of 2022 is disposed of. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)