← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/1622/2024dismissed as rejected

Susanto Panda And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

2024-05-07Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi1 pages

07.5.2024 SL No. 48 Ct No. 29 SB C.R.M (A). 1622 of 2024 In the matter of: Susanta Panda & Anr.

Md. Shahjahan Hossain Ms. Sanjida Sultana Mr. Prithwiraj Biswas ...for the Petitioners Ms. A. Bhattacharyya ... for the State

1. Petitioners renew the prayer for anticipatory bail.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits that the police filed charge sheet. Therefore requirement for placing the petitioners in custody no longer exist.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials in the case diary. Prayer for anticipatory bail was rejected on March 21, 2023 in C.R.M (A) 1155 of 2023. The police case is dated October 13, 2024.

4. Mere filing of charge sheet is cannot be construed as a material change in circumstances so as to allow revisit to the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. No other ground is canvassed apart from filing of charge sheet,

5. In such circumstances, we are unable to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

6. The application for anticipatory bail, is thus, rejected. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)