Laddu Yadav @ Ram Sewak Yadav And ORS. v. State Of West Bengal

16/06/2026 D/L - 37 Court No.28 S. Kundu Allowed C.R.M.(A) 1435 of 2026 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 482 of the BNSS, 2023. In connection with Kulti P.S case no. 107 of 2026 dated 04/03/2026 under Sections 118(1)/109/3(5) of the BNS.

In the matter of: Laddu Yadav @ Ram Sewak Yadav & Ors.

...Petitioners.

Ms. Puja Goswami ...for the petitioners.

Mr. Brajesh JHa Mr. Sandeep Prasad Shaw ...for the State.

1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners submits as follows. There was a fight between neighbours and relatives over a previous issue. Both sides suffered injuries but none was grievous in nature. There are case and counter case.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State relies on the case diary and opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. He refers to the injury reports, which, however, do not show infliction of any grievous injury. He also refers to the statements of witnesses including the victim. Charge sheet has been submitted.

3. Considering the above, the other materials available in the case diary and the fact that charge sheet has been submitted, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners.

4. In the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also be subject to further conditions that the petitioners shall surrender before the learned jurisdictional Court and pray for bail within four weeks from date. The petitioners shall regularly attend the jurisdictional Court and shall not threaten or intimidate the witnesses.

5. Accordingly, the application for anticipatory bail is allowed.

6. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance with requisite formalities.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)