Sunil Roy Chowdhury v. Pritish Pathak

18.07.2022.

C.P.A.N. 1191 of 2000 In WPA 351 of 1997 Sunil Roy Chowdhury Vs.

Pritish Pathak ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)