Abu Taleb And ANR. v. State Of West Bengal

C.R.M. 4813 of 2021 b.das 10.11.2021 Court No.29 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Harishchandrapur P.S. Case No. 265 of 2021 dated 03/04/2021 under Sections 341/325/326/307/354/34 of the Indian Penal Code adding Section 302 of the IPC. (reject) And In the matter of: Abu Taleb & Anr.

....petitioners.

Ms. Sujata Das ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Sudip Ghosh Mr. A. K. Datta ...for the State.

Mr. S. Sarkar Mr. A. Sarkar ...for the de-facto complainant.

Petitioners seek bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that considering the period of detention of the petitioners and considering their involvement in the incident, the petitioners should be granted bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statement recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the complainant and the statements of the injured victims recorded under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Having considered the gravity of the offences and the complicity of the petitioners therein, we are unable to grant bail to the petitioners.

The application for anticipatory bail being C.R.M. 4813 of 2021 is, thus, rejected.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Ananda Kumar Mukherjee, J.)