Ful Mia v. Canara Bank And ORS.

15.09.2025 d.p.

In The High Court At Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side W.P.A 11166 of 2025 Ful Mia -versus Canara Bank & Ors.

Mr. Kamalesh Bhattacharyya, Md. Jamaluddin Ahmed.

...For the Petitioner.

Ms. Sreemoyee Mitra.

...For the Bank.

1.

Affidavit of service and the supplementary affidavit filed in Court today are taken on record. 2.

The petitioner challenges the steps taken by the Bank to put up the secured asset of the petitioner on sale.

3.

During the pendency of the writ petition, it has been submitted that, the due amount has been cleared by the petitioner.

4.

Learned advocate appearing on behalf of the Bank submits that the subject auction failed. The Bank has received full payment from the petitioner and the Bank does not want to proceed with the sale any further.

5.

In view of such submission, the writ petition stands disposed of. The parties shall take steps in the matter in accordance with law.

6.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

( Amrita Sinha, J.)