Sushil Kumar Bagla v. Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Jalpaiguri & ANR

26.06.2025 Item No.11 Ct. No. 30 Aloke WPA 8452 of 2016 Sushil Kumar Bagla Vs.

Regional Provident Fund Commissioner & Anr.

Mr. Anil Kr. Gupta ... for the respondent/PF Authority None appears for the petitioner on call.

Learned counsel for the respondent/PF Authority is present.

The present writ petitioner is of the year 2016.

As none appears for the petitioner on call, the writ petition stands dismissed for default. Connected application, if any, stands disposed of.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Shampa Dutt (Paul), J.)