Pradip Rajbanshi And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

16.06.2022 Sl. No.127 akd [ALLOWED] C. R. M. (A) 2754 of 2022 In Re: An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 13.06.2022 in connection with Malda Police Station Case No. 179 of 2022 dated 29.04.2022 under Sections 448/323/325/308/354B/34 of the Indian Penal Code. (G.R. Case No.2506 of 2022) And In Re: Pradip Rajbanshi & Ors.

... Petitioners Mr. Soubhik Mitter Ms. Rajnandini Das ... for the petitioners Mr. Imran Ali Ms. Manisha Sharma ... for the State Heard the learned advocate appearing for both the parties. Having considered the materials on record and bearing in mind the nature of allegations in the light of the submission there is a long standing family feud and as injuries do not appear to be grievous or life-threatening, we are of the opinion custodial interrogation of the accused/petitioners may not be necessary in the facts of the present case and they may be granted anticipatory bail.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the accused/petitioners, namely (1) Pradip Rajbanshi, (2) Kishore Rajbanshi, (3) Madhab Rajbanshi, (4) Ganesh Rajbanshi, (5) Anup Rajbanshi, (6) Biswajit Rajbanshi, (7) Latika Rajbanshi & (8) Putul Rajbanshi, be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.

appear before the court below and pray for regular bail within four weeks from date.

The application for anticipatory bail is, thus, disposed of. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)