← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRR/1529/2016dismissed

Firoja Khatun @ Firoza Khatoon v. Altap Hossain & ANR.

2025-11-24Hon'Ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta2 pages

24.11.2025 Court No.23 Item No.60 pk CRR 1529 of 2016 Firoja Khatun @ Firoza Khatoon Vs.

Altap Hossain and another 1.

None appears on behalf of either of the parties. No accommodation is sought for. Even on earlier occasion, none appeared on behalf of the petitioner.

2.

This case is pending since 2016. Almost 9 years have already passed.

3.

The instant Revisional application has been filed by the petitioner challenging the judgment and order dated 29.02.2016 passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Gangarampur stationed at Buniadpur, Dakshin Dinajpur in Criminal Revision No. 14 of 2015 affirming the monthly maintenance amount of Rs. 1,500/- for the petitioner/ wife, as awarded by the learned Judicial Magistrate, Gangarampur at Buniadpur, Dakshin Dinajpur vide order dated 02.09.2015 passed in M.R. Case No. 112 of 2014/M.T.R. Case No. 645 of 2014.

4.

The learned Judge also modified the awarded monthly maintenance amount of Rs. 1,500/- for her daughter to Rs. 1,000/- per month. Therefore, the petitioner/wife filed this Revisional application challenging the said impugned judgment and order in the year 2016.

5.

After going through the judgments passed by the Trial Court as well as the Revisional Court, this Court does not find

any infirmity or error in passing such judgment and order by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge as the petitioner claimed that her husband was earning Rs.15,000/- per month from his landed property. However, no such evidence was brought on record to consider that her husband was earning Rs. 15,000/-per month. Rather it is admitted that husband/opposite party was a day labour. 6.

Therefore, the impugned order calls for no interference. 7.

Hence, this revisional application being CRR 1529 of 2016 is dismissed. In view of dismissal of this revisional application, connected pending application, if any, is also dismissed.

8.

Interim order, if any, stands vacated.

9.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Ajay Kumar Gupta, J.)