Abu Hena v. State Of West Bengal

29.06.2026 Serial no. 159 [G.S.D] CRM (NDPS) 1102 of 2026 In re : An Application for Bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973/under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 in connection with Lalgola PS Case No. 712 of 2025 dated 09.08.2025 u/s 21(c)/29 of the NDPS Act, corresponding to NDPS Case No. 143 of 2025.

-AndIn the matter of : Abu Hena ... Petitioner(s) Mr. J. I. Hossain ... for the Petitioner(s) Ms. Koel Mukherjee ... for the State-respondent(s) Learned advocate for the petitioner submits the alleged recovery in the present case is 286 gm of heroin. The petitioner is in custody for 10 months and the prosecution has relied upon 18 witnesses in order to prove its case.

Learned advocate for the State submits that next date has been fixed for consideration of charges. The learned trial court under such circumstances would overcome the stage of consideration of charges at the earliest and within a period of three months from the date of communication of this order complete the evidence of the seizure list witnesses.

I have taken into account the chemical examiner's report which do not enure any benefit to the present petitioner.

Having regard to the overall circumstances, at this stage, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. Hence, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is Rejected.

However, the petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail aforesaid schedule is over. Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) of is dismissed.

Memo of Evidence submitted be kept with the record. Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon'ble High Court, Calcutta. Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties subject to compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)