Utpal Biswas v. Dhiman Biswas And ANR

21-05-2025 Item no.30

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Civil Revisional Jurisdiction Subrata Bhattacharyya AR(C) CO No.1789 of 2025 Utpal Biswas -vsSri Dhiman Biswas & Anr.

Mr. Siva Prasad Ghose Ms. Neha Roy Burman ...for the petitioner This application under Article 227 of the Constitution is at the instance of the plaintiff praying for a direction upon the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Ranaghat, Nadia to dispose of O.S. No.06 of 2022 expeditiously.

Mr Ghose, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, submits that the evidence of the petitioner has been concluded and that repeated dates have been filed for evidence of the opposite parties-witnesses. He submits that the opposite parties are trying to delay the hearing of the probate suit.

In view of the order sought and proposed to be passed, there is no necessity to direct issuance notice upon the opposite parties. However, learned advocate for the petitioner shall be obliged to serve a copy of this revisional application along with this order upon the opposite parties or upon the learned advocate representing the opposite parties before learned the trial judge. From the order sheet appended to this application, this court finds that July 2, 2025 has been fixed for evidence by the opposite parties-witnesses.

In view thereof, CO No.1789 of 2025 stands

disposed of by requesting the learned Additional District Judge, Fast Track Court, Ranaghat to proceed in accordance with law, in the event the opposite partieswitnesses do not appear on July 2, 2025. Learned judge is requested to make an endeavour to dispose of the O.S. No.06 of 2022 as expeditiously as possible without granting any unnecessary adjournments to either of the parties.

All parties are to act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this court. Certified copy of this order, if applied for, shall be made available to the parties.

[Hiranmay Bhattacharyya, J]