Arpita Sarkar v. Rupesh Kumar And ANR
CPAN 138 of 2018 Items-128-09-2022 Purnima Das 7.
Versus
Saurabh Kr. Das & Anr.
Ct. 8 sg With CPAN 1371 of 2019 Arpita Sarkar
Versus
Zafar Ajmal Kidwai, Supdt of Police, Nadia With CPAN 547 of 2018 Arpita Sarkar
Versus
Rupesh Kumar & Anr.
With CPAN 86 of 2018 Smt. Kakali Chakraborty
Versus
Indevar Pandey & Ors.
With FMA 1277 of 2015 The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Versus
Purnima Das & Ors.
Rules are drawn up in separate With sheets WP.ST 447 of 2013 Arpita Sarkar
Versus
State of West Bengal & Ors.
With WP.ST 78 of 2014 CAN 1 of 2015 (old CAN 6862 of 2015) Kakali Chakraborty Dutta
Versus
State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Anjan Bhattacharya, Adv.
Ms. Anita Shaw, Adv.
...for the petitioner in CPAN 138/2018 Mr. Indranath Mitra, Adv.
Mr. Subhankar Das, Adv.
...for the petitioner in CPAN 1371/2018 & CPAN 547/2018 Mr. Sukumar Ghosh, Adv.
Ms. Moumita Ghosh, Adv.
...for the petitioner in CPAN 86/2018 Mr. Anirban Roy, Ld. GP Mr. Pinaki Dhole, Adv.
Mr. Avishek Prasad, Adv.
...for the alleged contemnors Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. In Re: CPAN 138 of 2018 In spite of giving opportunity to comply with the order dated 13th September, 2017 no satisfactory explanation could be offered for not complying with the order dated 13th September, 2017. Rule do issue against the alleged added contemnor, being the present Secretary, Department of Panchayat and Rural Development, Government of West Bengal.
In Re: CPAN 1371 of 2019 In spite of giving opportunity to comply with the order dated 13th September, 2017 no satisfactory explanation could be offered for not complying with the order dated 13th September, 2017. Rule do issue against the alleged contemnor, being the present Superintendent of Police, Nadia, P.O. Krishnagar, District Nadia. In Re: CPAN 547 of 2018 This contempt application was filed prior to order of confirmation passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court on 23rd July,
2019.
In view thereof, this application stands dismissed as withdrawn.
In Re: CPAN 86 of 2018 In spite of giving opportunity to comply with the order dated 13th September, 2017 no satisfactory explanation could be offered for not complying with the order dated 13th September, 2017, Rule do issue against the alleged added contemnor nos. 1, 2 and 3. The petitioners shall put in requisites for effect service of Rules upon the alleged contemnors by 29th September, 2022. Rules are made returnable on 10th November, 2022 at 2 PM. Pendency of the Rules shall not prevent the alleged contemnors from implementing the order dated 13th September, 2017.
(Soumen Sen, J.) (Tapabrata Chakraborty, J.) (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)