← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/1982/2023allowed

Bidesh Ranjan Dutta v. State Of West Bengal

2023-05-15Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Md. Shabbar Rashidi2 pages

15.05.2023 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 1982 of 2023 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Pingla Police Station Case No. 79 of 2023 dated 23.02.2023 under Sections 406/420/463/466/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Bidesh Ranjan Dutta ...... petitioner Mr. Soumyajit Das Mahapatra ....for the petitioner Mr. Tanmoy Kumar Ghosh Mr. Asraf Mondal ....for the State The petitioner, apparently, is a witness to a Deed, which is the subject matter of a civil suit filed in the year 2019. Apparently, the police complaint is based on a written document.

The issue as to whether the document concerned was forged or not is an issue in the title suit.

Criminal liability, if any, will follow such decision of the civil suit.

Consequently, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the

conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer as and when called for till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear on every date before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)