Tausif Alam v. Union Of India And ORS.

11.1.2023 ks WPA 10796 of 2022 sl. 11 Tausif Alam Vs Union of India & Ors.

Mr. Sauradeep Majumder ... For the Petitioner.

Ms. Rajashree Venket Kundalia ... For the Respondents.

Heard learned Advocates appearing for the parties. I find that the scope and ambit of this writ petition is very limited. By this writ petition, petitioner has challenged the impugned seizure of vehicle and goods in question by the CGST Authority concerned. Such seizure was made on 1st of September, 2021.

Petitioner has prayed for release of the seized vehicle and goods in question which according to the learned Advocate appearing for the respondents have already been released and so far as the adjudication order is concerned, it has already been passed which is an appealable order.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case I am not inclined to entertain this writ petition being WPA 10796 of 2022 and accordingly the same is dismissed. However, dismissal of this writ petition will not be a bar on the part of the petitioner to seek any remedy before any forum, if so available under the law.

( Md. Nizamuddin, J. )