Subrata Maity@Subrata Kumar Maity v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

22.09.2021 SL No. 7 Court No. 24 (P.M.) WPA 12258 of 2021 Subrata Maity @ Subrata Kumar Maity Vs The State of West Bengal & Ors.

(Via Video Conference) Mr. Saibal Acharya, Mr. Banshi Badan Maity, Mr. P. Bag ... for the petitioner Mr. Naba Kumar Das, Mr. Subhobrata Das ... for the State The petitioner's prayer in the writ petition was for consideration of his representation made before the Commissioner of School Education (Primary Branch). During the pendency of the writ petition, it has been submitted, that the representation has duly been considered.

In view of such submission, the instant writ petition becomes infructuous as the grievance of the petitioner has already been redressed by the respondent.

WPA 12258 of 2021 has become infructuous.

The petitioner will be at liberty to challenge the reasoned order that has been passed in his favour, if so advised.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be given to the parties on completion of usual formalities.

( Amrita Sinha, J.)