Shibu Ghosh @ Hoi Ghosh v. State Of West Bengal

24.06.2022.

19.

Ct.No.28 as (Rejected) C.R.M. (DB) 1880 of 2022 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Tehatta P.S. Case No.532 of 2019 dated 15.11.2019 under Sections 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of : Shibu Ghosh @ Hoi Ghosh.

... Petitioner.

Mr. Dilip Kr. Maiti.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, ld. A.P.P., Ms. Eshita Dutta.

...for the State.

Heard the learned Advocates appearing for the parties. Petitioner renews his prayer for bail and submits he is in custody for over two years.

Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail. He submits date has been fixed for recording prosecution evidence.

We have considered the materials on record. Statements of witnesses recorded under Section 164 show involvement of the petitioner in the crime. His prayer for bail was rejected earlier. Date for recording prosecution evidence has been fixed. Under such circumstances, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected.

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)