Calcutta High CourtCRR/1682/2008dismissed for non prosecution

Subimal Mukherjee v. State Of West Bengal

2024-01-02Hon'Ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay3 pages

02.01.2024 9 to 40 cm CRR 1670 of 2008 With CRR 1672 of 2008 With CRA 1673 of 2008 With CRR 1674 of 2008 With CRR 1676 of 2008 With CRR 1677 of 2008 With CRR 1678 of 2008 With CRR 1680 of 2008 With CRR 1681 of 2008 With CRR 1682 of 2008 With CRR 1683 of 2008 With CRR 1684 of 2008 With CRR 1685 of 2008 With CRR 1686 of 2008 With CRR 1689 of 2008 With CRR 1690 of 2008 With CRR 1691 of 2008 With CRR 1692 of 2008 With CRR 1693 of 2008 With CRR 1694 of 2008 With CRR 1695 of 2008 With CRR 1696 of 2008 With CRR 1698 of 2008 With CRR 1700 of 2008

With CRR 1701 of 2008 With CRR 1702 of 2008 With CRR 1704 of 2008 With CRR 1705 of 2008 With CRR 1706 of 2008 With CRR 1708 of 2008 With CRR 1709 of 2008 With CRR 1710 of 2008 With CRR 1711 of 2008 With CRR 1713 of 2008 With CRR 1714 of 2008 With CRR 1715 of 2008 With CRR 1716 of 2008 With CRR 1717 of 2008 With CRR 1718 of 2008 With CRR 1719 of 2008 In the matter of : Subimal Mukherjee.

.... petitioner.

Mr. Kaushik Gupta .... for the petitioner.

Ms. Aparna Banerjee ... for the P.F.

In compliance with the order dated 13.12.2023, Mr. Gupta, learned advocate has filed written instruction on behalf of the petitioner expressing his unwillingness to proceed with the instant revisional applications and

files a written instruction dated 15.12.2023 addressed to the advocate on record. Let the same be kept on record. Under such circumstances, the instant revisional applications are dismissed for non-prosecution. Copy of the order be sent to the Department and learned trial court for information.

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)