Sabina Mondal@Sabeda Mondal v. State Of West Bengal

C.R.M. (A) 2890 of 2022 (AD) 20.06.2022 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Hanskhali P.S. Case No.340 of 2022 dated 17/04/2022 under Sections 448/326/307/34 of the Indian Penal Code,1860. And Court No.29 (Allowed) In the matter of: Sabina Mondal @ Sabeda Mondal ....petitioner.

Ms. Sananda Bhattacharyya ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Shiladitya Banerjee Mr. Mainak Gupta ...for the State.

Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was falsely implicated.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report of the victim. Considering the nature of injury suffered by the victim and considering the fact that another co-accused was granted bail by the jurisdictional Court and considering the fact that the police filed charge sheet, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and also subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused

and in default, the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed. C.R.M. (A) 2890 of 2022 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)