← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/2915/2022allowed

Mithun Marandi v. State Of West Bengal

2022-06-29Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De2 pages

29.06.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 2915 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Md Bazar Police Station Case No. 150 of 2022 under Sections 143/341/325/326/307/354/354(B)/379/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

And In Re : Mithun Marandi ...... petitioner Mr. Bikash Ranjan Bhattacharya Mr. Samim Ahmed Mr. Arnab Sinha Ms. G. Parveen ....for the petitioner Mr. Binoy Panda Ms. Puspita Saha ....for the State Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Learned senior advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner was falsely implicated. The petitioner was protesting against illegal occupation of tribal land whereupon the false police case was lodged upon the petitioner. Learned advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the injury report of the victims and to the materials in the case diary.

Considering the nature of injury suffered and considering the materials in the case diary and the involvement of the petitioner therein, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on further condition that the petitioner shall meet the Investigating Officer once a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)