Idrish Molla Alias Idris Molla v. State Of West Bengal
D/L24 15.06.2026 C.R.M. (NDPS) 1159 of 2026 Bpg.
Dismissed In Re: An application for bail under Section 483 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita filed in connection with Mograhat Police Station Case No.87 of 2025 dated 25.03.2025 under Sections 20(Ii)(b)(c)/25/29 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985; Idrish Molla alias Idris Molla
Versus
The State of West Bengal Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty Mr. S.S. Saha.
...for the petitioner.
Dr. Pradip Banerjee Mr. Arnab Sau.
...for the State.
Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was arrested on 7th July, 2025 and since then he is in custody for more than 11 months. There were alleged recovery of 26 kgs. of ganja and the petitioner was roped in the case where there was a seizure of 163.7 kgs. of ganja. The said complicity was on the basis of the statement of the co-accused. Learned advocate for the State submits that there has been huge recovery in the present case from the secret chamber of a pickup van and further recovery was from the house of the petitioner.
I have taken into account the huge quantum of seizure in the present case as also the period of detention of the petitioner which is more than 11 months. Charges have already been framed.
The evidence of P.W.1 is complete and the prosecution intends to examine 16 witnesses in support of its case.
Having considered the totality of the circumstances, at this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. Petitioner would be at liberty to renew his prayer for bail after the evidence of the seizure list witnesses are over. It has been pointed out that there are six seizure list witnesses.
Considering the same, learned trial would complete the seizure list witnesses within a period of five months as has been directed in another case.
With the aforesaid observations, CRM(NDPS) 1159 of 2026 is dismissed at this stage.
All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)