Pappu Kishianchand Lahori v. Union Of India

29.05.2026 PG Ct. No. 7 Allowed C.R.M. (NDPS) 1154 of 2026 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with N 7 of 2026, NDPS/442/2026 arising out of F. No.- SI(VII)-25/2026 (AIU) dated 24.01.2026 complaint regarding the commission of offences under section 20(b)(ii) (B) and section 23(b) read with section 8 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 as amended And In the matter of : Mr. Papu Kishianchand Lahori .... Petitioner Mr. Arunangshu Chakraborty Mr. Shashanka Sekhar Saha ...for the Petitioner Mr. Gourango Kumar Das ...for the Union of India The prosecution case is that 4159 Grams of Ganja was recovered from the possession of the present petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 24.01.2026.

Accordingly, petitioner prays for bail on any terms and conditions.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Air Customs opposed the prayer for bail.

Having heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the opposite party, it appears that the quantity of contraband involved in the instant case, is much below the commercial quantity.

Furthermore, the petitioner is in custody since 24.01.2026.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case, petitioner's prayer for bail is allowed. Accordingly, the petitioner namely, Mr.

Papu Kishianchand Lahori shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 20,000/- with two registered sureties of Rs. 10,000/-each, of which one must be local, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, North 24-Parganas, and also on condition that the accused person shall not mis-use the liberty granted by this Court and he shall not tamper with any evidence orally or documentary during the trial. He shall not leave the jurisdiction of trial court without taking leave from trial court. He shall not absent himself on any day during trial and shall not commit any offence while on bail. He shall give his mobile phone number to the local police station and shall not change it without prior permission of the trial court and he shall not in any manner try to delay the trial. Be it mentioned in case of violation of any of the conditions as above, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail without making any further reference to this court.

Be it further mentioned, that anything said herein shall not be construed as an expression of opinion on the merit of the case.

Accordingly, CRM (NDPS) 1154 of 2026 is disposed of.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order, duly applied for, be given to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities.

(Dr. Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)