← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/9518/2010dismissed for default

Prabhabati Naskar v. Cstc & ORS

2025-03-07Hon'Ble Justice Ananya Bandyopadhyay1 pages

29.07.2025 DL-01 Ct. No. 33 Srimanta In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side IA No.:CAN/2/2025 in WPA/9518/2010 Prabhabati naskar & Ors.

-Vs.- CSTC & Ors.

Mr. Baidurya Ghosal, Ms. Sharmistha Podder, Mr. Saikat Mukherjee, Ms. Anupama Biswas ...for the petitioner.

The learned Advocate representing the petitioners submitted that the Advocate-on-record had filed the fresh vakalatnama on 11th April, 2025. The averments in paragraph 4 in CAN application being 2/2025 is contradictory to the submission of the learned Advocate representing the petitioners who seeks to not press the application and file a fresh application and the same is allowed.

Affidavit-of-service filed by the learned Advocate representing the petitioners be kept on record. Liberty is given to the petitioners to file fresh application.

(Ananya Bandyopadhyay, J.)