← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM(M)/1335/2026dismissed

Soumen Pramanick v. State Of West Bengal

2026-06-12Hon'Ble Justice Tirthankar Ghosh2 pages

12.06.2026

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Item No.66 CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION Ct.No.35 dc.

Rejected C.R.M. (M) 1335 of 2026 In Re : An Application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, filed in connection with Palashipara Police Station Case No. 537 of 2025 dated 21.10.2025 under Sections 123/65(1) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 6 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012. And In Re : Soumen Pramanick ... Petitioner.

Mr. Joydeep Biswas, Mr. Asraf Mandal, Mr. Kaushik Ghosh ... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Moyukh Mukherjee, Mr. Saswata Chatterjee ... For the State.

Mr. Priyankar Ganguly, Ms. Pipasa Chakraborty ... For the de facto complainant.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody for more than seven and a half months and the petitioner as well as the victim consumed alcohol and subsequently the petitioner has been falsely implicated in connection with the instant case. Learned advocate appearing for the de facto complainant opposes the prayer for bail and submits that the victim, a 14 years old girl, was forced to consume alcohol and thereafter she was ravished.

Learned advocate appearing for the State also opposes the prayer for bail and draws the attention of the Court to

the statement of the victim recorded under Section 183 of the BNSS as well as the medical report.

I have taken into account the materials appearing in the case diary as also the fact that charges have been framed and witness action is about to commence. Consequently the evidence of the victim has not yet commenced. At this stage, I am not inclined to release the petitioner on bail. As such, the prayer for bail of the petitioner is rejected. Petitioner would be at liberty to approach this Court after the evidence of vulnerable witnesses is over. The application for bail, being CRM (M) 1335 of 2026, is, thus, disposed of.

All concerned parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)