← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM/5239/2021rejected

Khairul Sk v. State Of West Bengal

2021-12-09Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Bivas Pattanayak4 pages

09.12.2021 sdas rejected C.R.M. 5239 of 2021 (via video conferencing) In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Baruipur Police Station Case No. 1039 of 2019 dated 23.05.2019 under Sections 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

And In Re : Khairul Sk. ..... petitioner Mr. Angshuman Chakraborty ... for the petitioner Mr. Rudradipta Nandy ... for the State Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that he is in custody for more than two years. He prays for bail of the petitioner.

Learned Counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Materials on record prima facie show that the petitioner had committed murder of his wife.

In view of gravity of the offence, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

The application for bail is, thus, rejected. Trial court is requested to conclude the trial at the earliest without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

(Bivas Pattanayak, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)

C.R.M. 192 of 2018 In Re.: An application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed on 05.01.2018 in connection with Karimpur Police Station Case No. 136 of 2012 dated 03.07.2012 under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code. And In Re : Rabish Kumar Upadhyay ..... petitioner Mr. Asraf Ali ... for the petitioner Mr. Debojyoti Deb ... for the State Having considered the materials on record prima facie disclosing involvement of the petitioner in the alleged crime of misappropriation of monies of the innocent depositors and the fact that the petitioner has absconded for a protracted period of time, we are not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage.

The application for bail is, thus, rejected. (Rajarshi Bharadwaj, J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)