Tathagata Chaudhuri @ Tathagata Chaudhury v. The State Of West Bengal

09.05.2024 Ct. No. 29 S.D.

Allowed C.R.M.(A) 1631 of 2024 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Bidhannagar Electronics Complex Police Station Case No. of dated 24.12.2023 under Sections 341/323/325/326/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 pending before the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bidhannagar, North 24 Parganas.

And In Re : Tathagata Chaudhuri @ Tathagata Chaudhury ...... petitioner Mr. Aniket Mitra Ms. Nandini Chatterjee Mr. Sayan Dutta ...for the petitioner Mr. Tanmoy Kumar Ghosh Mr. Mainak Gupta ...for the State Petitioner before us is a student of a University. After the examination, apparently a free fight took place between two groups.

Considering the fact that the petitioner is a student and this is the first police complaint as against him, we deem it appropriate to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/-, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The petitioner report before the Investigating Officer once a week till the conclusion of the Signed By :

Surojit Das High Court of Calcutta 9 th of May 2024 04:09:35 AM

investigation. The petitioner shall appear on every date before the Jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court. This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.) Signed By :

Surojit Das High Court of Calcutta 9 th of May 2024 04:09:35 AM