← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRR/1897/2024dismissed for default

Siddhartha Pandey And Another v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

2025-07-02Hon'Ble Dr. Justice Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee2 pages

10.09.2025 Court No.32 SL No.47 S.Gayen

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

CRIMINAL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE CRR 1897 of 2024 with CRAN 1 of 2025 Dr. Siddhartha Pandey & Anr.

Versus

The State of West Bengal & Ors.

Mr. Debangshu Dinda Mr. S. Ray ...for the Petitioners Mr. Debarshi Brahma Mr. Subarna Banik ...for the Opposite Party Nos. 2 and 3 Mr. Arijit Ganguly Mr. Santanu Talukdar ...for the State In Re: CRAN 1 of 2025

1. Affidavit of service filed by the petitioners is taken on record.

2. All the learned counsel appearing for the parties to this CRAN application are present.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners has prayed for restoration of the revisional application which was dismissed for non-representation of the petitioner on the relevant date of hearing.

4. It is submitted that at the relevant point of time the learned counsel for the petitioners was on legs before a Coordinate Bench of this Court and could not appear when the matter was called in.

5. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as explanations delineated in the petition itself, the prayer for restoration stands allowed.

6. The revisional application being CRR 1897 of 2024 be restored to its original file and number.

7. Accordingly, the application being CRAN 1 of 2025 stands disposed of.

In Re: CRR 1897 of 2024

8. Supplementary affidavit filed by the petitioners is taken record.

9. Let the matter appear in the combined monthly list of November, 2025.

10. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)