Sattar Mallick v. Ishani Paul And ORS

December 16, 2022 Sl. No.6 Court No.29 s.biswas CPAN 577 of 2021 Sattar Mallick Vs.

Ishani Paul and others In WPA 6477 of 2020 Md. Younush Mondal, Advocate ... for the petitioner Mr. A. Banerjee, Sr. Standing Counsel Md. T. M. Siddiqui, Mr. N. Chatterjee, Advocates ... for the alleged contemnors Mr. Soumyadeep Biswas, Advocate ... for the respondent No.5 The last letter of the petitioner annexed in the contempt petition does not give details of any violation of the order of the High Court.

That apart, the police took steps under Section 107/116(c) of the Cr.P.C. upon receiving a compliant. Learned advocate appearing for the private respondent submits that there is civil suit pending and that the petitioner sold the property.

In such circumstances, it cannot be said that there is deliberate or willful violation of the order of the High Court.

Hence, CPAN 577 of 2021 is disposed of.

(Debangsu Basak, J.)