Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/2981/2022allowed

Mozid Dafadar @ Mojid Dafadar And ORS v. State Of West Bengal

2022-06-24Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De2 pages

C.R.M. (A) 2981 of 2022 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Tehatta Police Station Case No. 495 of 2022 dated 17.06.2022 under Sections 448/325/307/354B/427/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Mozid Dafadar @ Mojid Dafadar & Ors. ....petitioners.

Mr. Kaustav Bagchi Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. Sourav Mukherjee Mr. Debayan Ghosh Ms. Priti Kar ...for the petitioners.

Ms. Sreyashee Biswas ...for the State.

24.06.2022 Sl. 13 Court No.29 (AD) (Allowed) Petitioners pray for anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioners submits that the incident arose out of the dispute between the neighbours.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the materials in the case diary. Considering the gravity of the offence, the involvement of the petitioners therein and the nature of injury suffered by the injured persons, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioners will report before the Investigating Officer once a

month till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioners shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed.

C.R.M. (A) 2981 of 2022 is, thus, disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)