Calcutta High CourtCRM(R)/43/2025dismissed for default

Xxxxx v. State Of West Bengal And ANR

2026-04-16Hon'Ble Justice Jay Sengupta1 pages

16/04/2026 D/L - 258 Court No.28 S. Kundu C.R.M.(R) 43 of 2025 In Re: An application for cancellation of anticipatory bail under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 483(3) of the BNSS. In connection with criminal misc Case no. 39 of 2025 granting the opposite parties prayer for anticipatory bail under Sections 329(4)/126(2)/127(2)/115(2)/117(2)/109/74/76/303(2)/ 351(2)/61(2)/3(5) of the BNS read with Section 12 of the POCSO Act.

In the matter of: XXX

...Petitioner.

Mr. Arindam Sen Md. Kutubuddin ...for the State.

1. No one appears on behalf of the petitioner, although the State is represented.

2. It appears that on the last occasion i.e. on 02.02.2026 no one represented the petitioner or prayed for any accommodation.

3. Accordingly, the application for cancellation of anticipatory bail is dismissed for default.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)