Calcutta High CourtCRM (A)/2982/2022allowed

Suva Tikadar v. State Of West Bengal

2022-06-24Hon'Ble Justice Debangsu Basak,Hon'Ble Justice Bibhas Ranjan De2 pages

C.R.M. (A) 2982 of 2022 In Re: - An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Tehatta Police Station Case No. 478 of 2022 dated 13.06.2022 under Sections 363/365 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Suva Tikadar ....petitioner.

Mr. Kaustav Bagchi Mr. Amanul Islam Mr. Sourav Mukherjee Mr. Debayan Ghosh Ms. Priti Kar ...for the petitioner.

Ms. Sujata Das Ms. Debjani Sahu ...for the State.

24.06.2022 Sl. 14 Court No.29 (AD) (Allowed) Petitioner prays for anticipatory bail.

Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that there was a relationship between the petitioner and the victim. The police complaint is a result of such relationship turning sour.

Learned Advocate appearing for the State draws the attention of the Court to the statements of the victim recorded under Section 161 of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as the one recorded under Section 164 thereof.

Considering the statements of the victim recorded both under Section 161 as well as under Section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, we grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a Bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only), with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the Arresting Officer and

subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioner will report before the Investigating Officer once a fortnight till the conclusion of the investigation and on condition that the petitioner shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioner in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.

Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is allowed.

C.R.M. (A) 2982 of 2022 is, thus, disposed of. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)