Maya Kundu And ORS v. State Of West Bengal
24.06.2022 Ct. No. 29 KAUSHIK Allowed C.R.M.(A) 3000 of 2022 In Re:- An application for anticipatory bail under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Gaighata Police Station Case No. 1164 of 2021 dated 12.12.2021 under Sections 498A/304B/302/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and under Sections 3/ 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act (Charge-sheet filed under Sections 498A/304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860). And In Re : Smt. Maya Kundu & Ors.
...... petitioners Mr. Arnab Chatterjee Ms. Dhanasree Biswas ....for the petitioners Mr. S. G. Mukherjee, Ld. PP Mr. Aniket Mitra ....for the State Considering the fact that the police filed charge-sheet, inter alia, under Section 304B of the Indian Penal Code after conducting investigation, inter alia, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and considering the fact that the husband was enlarged on bail and considering the omnibus nature of allegations, we deem it appropriate to enlarge the petitioners on anticipatory bail.
Accordingly, we direct that in the event of arrest the petitioners shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- each, with two sureties of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be subject to the
conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and on condition that the petitioners shall appear every day before the jurisdictional Court on and from the date fixed for appearance of the accused and in default the jurisdictional Court will pass appropriate order to secure the presence of the petitioners in Court including cancelling the anticipatory bail granted without further reference to this Court.
This application for anticipatory bail is, thus, allowed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Bibhas Ranjan De, J.)