← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/11735/2022dismissed

Debasish Ray v. The C.E.S.C. Ltd And ORS

2022-06-30Hon'Ble Justice Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya3 pages

30.06.2022 TN WPA No. 11735 of 2022 Mr. Debasish Ray Vs.

The Calcutta Electric Supply Corporation Limited and others Mr. Suvadip Bhattacharjee .... for the petitioner Mr. Debanjan Mukherji ....for the CESC Limited Affidavit-of-service filed in court today be kept on record.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is not in a position to deposit the entire amount assessed provisionally, but is willing to deposit a major portion of the claim of the Calcutta Electric Supply Corporation Limited (for short "the CESC Limited") for the purpose of getting restoration of electricity connection, which is a basic necessity. Such contention is controverted by learned counsel for the CESC Limited, who places reliance on the provisions of Sections 126 and 135 of the Electricity Act, 2003, as well as two judgments of this court, to substantiate the proposition that unless the

entire amount of claim is deposited, restoration of electricity connection cannot be given under the law. At best, deposit of fifty per cent of the claim entitles the consumer to prefer an appeal against a final order of assessment.

The said judgments are:

an unreported judgment dated December 09, 2021 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P.A. No.18448 of 2021 and an unreported Division Bench judgment dated May 05, 2022 passed in FMA 197 of 2022.

Upon considering the submissions of the parties and the cited judgments as well as the relevant law, it is clear that the law contemplates a deposit of the full amount of claim in the event a restoration of electricity connection is to be obtained by the consumer, against whom a charge of theft is levelled. As such, despite having full sympathy for the petitioner, there is no scope of interfering in the writ petition.

Accordingly, WPA No.11735 of is dismissed without any order as to costs.

However, nothing in this order shall preclude the petitioner either from depositing the entire amount of the claim, whenever convenient to the petitioner, in order to get back restoration of electricity supply, alternatively, to prefer a challenge to the assessment

made by the CESC authorities before the appropriate forum.

Urgent photostat certified copies of this order, if applied for, be made available to the parties upon compliance with the requisite formalities.

(Sabyasachi Bhattacharyya, J.)