← Library
Calcutta High CourtCRM (DB)/2084/2023allowed

Aniruddha Ghosh v. State Of West Bengal

2023-06-27Hon'Ble Justice Joymalya Bagchi,Hon'Ble Justice Ajay Kumar Gupta3 pages

C.R.M. (DB) 2084 of 2023 27.06.2023 Sl. 8 Court No. 29 Sourav (Allowed) In Re: - An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Alipore Police Station Case No. 142 of 2019 dated 29.11.2019 under Sections 420/409/406/120B IPC read with Sections 7A/8/9/13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (Special Case No. 4 of 2020). And In the matter of: Aniruddha Ghosh ....petitioner.

Ms. Anusua Sinha ...for the petitioner.

Mr. Neguive Ahmed Ms. Anita Gaur ...for the State.

1. Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. The petitioner being a Nazir is stated to be involved in misappropriation of Rs. 12 lakhs and odd in a tender process. He is stated to be in custody for more than three years. Charge is stated to be framed and trial has commenced.

3. Now vehement argument is placed on behalf of the State and the concerned Registrar, Civil Court on the ground that the witnesses may be terrorized but such contention does not commend to us inasmuch as the District Judge and Registrar are there to give protection to their own witnesses when the offence is alleged to have been committed in connection with court's work at Nazarat Department.

4. We both having come from the lower judiciary fail to understand how the Registrar who is the in-charge of the Nazarat could be let scot-free in the case. All these things happened for the complacence of the concerned District Judge and the Registrar. The case is like to give a bad name

to the dog and kill him.

5. We failed to understand how the petitioner has been in custody for long when all the evidence in the case is documentary in nature which are to be proved by some of the witnesses.

6. We do not find any chance of tampering in evidence as trial has ready commenced and we are satisfied that the petitioner has no means to fly out from this country to evade the trial.

7. Regard being had to such facts and submissions, the factum of permanent residence of the petitioner, nature of offence and the stage of trial, it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 8th Court, Alipore, South 24 Parganas, in Special Case No. 4 of 2020 on such terms and conditions as deemed just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case including the condition that i) the petitioner shall appear before the learned Trial Court on each date of substantive hearing; ii) he shall not come to the compound of the Alipore District Court except for attending trial.

8. Accordingly, the prayer for bail is allowed.

9. The application being CRM (DB) 2084 of 2023 is disposed of.

10. Learned Trial Court is hereby directed to act upon the server copy of this order.

(Chitta Ranjan Dash, J.) (Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)