Arup Kr. Mondal v. Tejendra Singh

13.07.2022.

C.P.A.N. 1036 of 2004 In WPA 17872 of 1993 Arup Kumar Mondal Vs.

Tejendra Singh ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)