Indus Tower Limited & ANR v. Gouri Kanta Mukherjee

7.

7.

(DL) (DL) 29.08.2025 29.08.2025 Ct. No. 18 (ARPAN) CPAN 672 OF 2012 IN W.P.A. 4804 OF 2011 (W.P. NOT IN FILE) INDUS TOWER LIMITED & ANOTHER VS.

GOURI KANTA MUKHERJEE, CHAIRMAN, HOOGHLY-CHINSURAH MUNICIPALITY, HOOGHLY Ms. Neha Gupta, Adv.

...for the Applicants 1.

At the time of call accommodation is prayed for on behalf of the applicants.

2.

Contempt application was taken up for consideration first on 4th April, 2025 and subsequently on 4th July, 2025 and on both occasions no one appeared for the applicants.

Therefore, prayer for further accommodation as made on behalf of the applicants is refused.

3.

Learned advocate representing the applicants is given opportunity to place the case. Matter is not argued. 4.

In view of aforesaid situation, this Court does not find it necessary to keep the contempt application pending further.

5.

Hence, contempt application stands dismissed and the contempt proceedings stand dropped.

6.

Urgent photostat certified copy of the order, if applied for, be given to the parties, upon usual undertakings. (Saugata Bhattacharyya, J.)