Tanu Pramanik @ Tanu Pramanik Bera v. State Of West Bengal

30.05.2025 Court No.6 Item No.35 Ssi CRM (M) 584 of 2025 In Re: - An application for bail under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Suraksha Nagarik Sanhita in connection with Nandakumar PS Case No.352 of dated 23.09.2022 under Sections 302/201/120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

And In the matter of: Tanu Pramanik @ Tanu Pramanik Bera ....Applicant/Petitioner.

Mr. Navanil De Mr. Subhrajit Dey ...for the petitioner Mr. Aniket Mitra Mr. S. Balial ..for the State

1. This Court has heard the learned advocate for the petitioner and the learned advocate for the State at length.

2. This Court has also considered the entire materials as placed before this Court including the materials available in the C.D.

3. On careful consideration of the entire materials, it reveals to this Court that the present accused petitioner is languishing in J.C. for a period of two years eight months and seven days. It further appears to this Court that the present case is based on circumstantial evidence. It reveals further that out of 28 charge sheeted witnesses, as of now, 6 P.W.s have been examined.

4. This Court finds that there is no immediate chance of conclusion of the trial. This Court has also noticed that no case has been made out on behalf of the State that in the

event, the present accused petitioner is enlarged on bail, she may abscond and/or tamper with the evidence.

5. Considering the entire circumstances and also considering the long detention of the present accused petitioner, this Court is inclined to take a lenient view.

6. It is ordered that the present accused petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000/-, with two registered sureties of like amount each, subject to the satisfaction of the learned Sessions Judge, Fast Track, 1st Court, Tamluk with a further condition that the present accused petitioner shall appear before the learned trial Court on each and every date of substantive hearing unless her personal appearance is dispensed with by the learned trial Court.

7. It is further directed that the present accused petitioner shall not tamper with any evidence and/or shall not induce and/or cause any threat to the charge sheeted witnesses.

8. It is made clear that in the event, the conditions as imposed by this Court is not complied with, the learned trial Court is at liberty to cancel the bail of the present accused petitioner without any further reference to this Court.

9. With the aforementioned observations, CRM (M) 584 of 2025 is disposed of.

(Partha Sarathi Sen, J.)