Sibaram Banerjee @ Shibaram Banerjee v. Golak Porel @ Golak Kr Porel & ORS

12.03 C.O. 1611 of 2017 Sibaram Banerjee @ Shibaram Banerjee -VersusGolak Porel @ Golak Kumar Porel & Ors. Ct.

No.

akb Parties are not represented.

I have reason to believe that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application. The revisional application, being C.O. 1611 of 2017 is dismissed for default.

Interim order, if there be any, stands vacated. There will be no order as to costs.

( Ajoy Kumar Mukherjee, J.)