Dharmdas Modak v. Hari Prassana De

15.07.2022.

C.P.A.N. 712 of 2006 In C.O. 18512 of 1992 Dharmdas Modak Vs.

Hari Prassana De ab Ct. 40 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner on repeated calls.

No accommodation is sought for.

Accordingly, the contempt application is dismissed for default.

There shall be no order as to costs.

All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court.

(Sugato Majumdar, J.)