Gouri Sarkar v. Khlaid Aizaz Ahmed
28.03.2025 Court No.13 Item No.1 AP CPAN 744 of 2023 In WPA 11428 of 2022 Gouri Sarkar Vs.
Mr. Khalid Aizaz Anwar, Director of Pension Provident Fund and Group Insurance Mr. Bhaskar Prosad Vaisya Mr. Niloy Baran Mondal ... For the DPPG.
1. The applicant is not represented.
2. Mr. Bhaskar Prosad Vaisya with Mr. Niloy Baran Mondal, who normally represents the DPPG, is directed to represent the DPPG in this matter.
3. Mr. Bhaskar Prosad Vaisya submits that PPO has been issued.
4. Therefore, nothing further remains to be adjudicated in this application.
5. Hence, the contempt application is disposed of.
6. Personal presence of the alleged contemnor, if any, is dispensed with.
7. Rule, if any, shall stand discharged.
8. There shall be no order as to costs.
9. All parties shall act on the server copy of this order duly downloaded from the official website of this Court. (Rajasekhar Mantha, J.)