Uttam Singh @ Uttam Singha @ Uttam Sing v. State Of West Bengal

30.06.2022.

11.

Ct.No.28.

as (Allowed) C.R.M. (DB) 2049 of 2022 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Moyna P. S. Case No.235 of 2019 dated 14.10.2019 under Sections 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code and charge sheet submitted under Sections 302/120B of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of : Uttam Singh @ Uttam Singha @ Uttam Sing.

.... Petitioner.

Mr. Ayan Basu, Mr. Sourav Bera, Mr. Sumit Routh.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, ld. A.P.P., Ms. Eshita Dutta.

...for the State.

Heard the learned Counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.

Petitioner is in custody for about 91 days. Co-accuseds are on bail.

Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

We have considered the materials on record. Keeping in mind the extent of complicity of the petitioner in the alleged crime and as co-accuseds similarly circumstanced with the petitioner have been enlarged on bail, we are inclined to extend the same privilege to the petitioner also.

Accordingly, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of

the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Tamluk, Purba Medinipur subject to condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the Trial Court without any justifiable cause, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

This application for bail is, thus, disposed of. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)