← Library
Calcutta High CourtWPA/11866/2018dismissed for default

Swapna Basu (Roy) v. Union Of India & ORS

2020-03-16Hon'Ble Justice Abhijit Gangopadhyay3 pages

16. 03 . 2021 WPA 11866 of 2018 ) (Via Video Conference) BP Sl. 4 Swapna Basu (Roy) Vs.

The Union of India & Ors.

Mr. Pankaj Agarwal Ms. Paramita Maity ..for the petitioner.

Mr. Nikhil Kumar Roy ..for the respondent nos. 4 to 10.

Mr. Amit Kumar Ghosh Mr. S.P. Shaw ..for the respondent no.11.

Mr. Anil Kumar Gupta ..for the Union of India.

This application is one for non-payment of gratuity of one of the wives of the petitioner. Learned advocate for the respondent nos. 4 to 10 submits that they have already paid the gratuity amount to another wife. They have already deposited the amount before the Controlling Authority.

I find that this matter cannot be decided without exchange of affidavits.

Parties are granted liberty to file affidavit-in-

opposition by six weeks from date, reply thereto, if any, be filed by two weeks thereafter.

Liberty to mention.

(Abhijit Gangopadhyay, J. )