Priyanka Sony v. State Of West Bengal

03.03.2025 Serial no.118 Dd CRM (DB) 1604 of 2024 In re : An Application for cancellation of Bail under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973.

-AndIn the matter of : Mrs. Priyanka Sony ... ...Petitioner Mr. Jaydeep Biswas, Mr. Kaushik Ghosh, Advocates ... ... For the Petitioner Mr. Rudradipta Nandy, APP Mr. Ashok Das, Advocates ... ...For the State Ms. Subhasree Patel, Mr. Anirban Dutta, Mr. Soham Banerjee, Advocates ... ...For the private Opposite Party No. 2 1.

Petitioner prays for cancellation of bail granted by order dated May 7, 2023.

2.

Learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that, the private opposite party surrendered before the jurisdictional Court and was granted bail. He submits that a notice under Section 41A of the Code of Criminal Procedure Code was issued to the private opposite party which was not required to be issued.

3.

State and the private opposite party are represented. 4.

Learned advocate appearing for the private opposite party submits that there are matrimonial disputes between the private parties. The petitioner approached the domestic violence forum and, thereafter, filed the present criminal complaint alleging forgery of a loan. Her client foreclosed such loan without any liability to the petitioner.

5.

Apparently, the loan transaction in respect of which, the alleged forgery is alleged to take place stood foreclosed at the behest of the private opposite party.

6.

Learned jurisdictional Court considered relevant parameters in granting bail to the private opposite party. 7.

In such circumstances, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned order.

8.

CRM (DB) 1604 of 2024 is accordingly dismissed. (Debangsu Basak, J.) (Md. Shabbar Rashidi, J.)