Calcutta High CourtCPAN/1393/2000dismissed for default

Goutam Neogi v. Kinkar Pal

2022-09-22Hon'Ble Justice Rabindranath Samanta2 pages

22-09-2022 Item no.12 Subrata Bhattacharyya

IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA

Special Jurisdiction Appellate Side CPAN No.1393 of 2000 Sri Goutam Neogy -vsSri Kinkar Pal & Ors.

arising out of WPA No.2078 of 2000 None ...for the petitioner To press the contempt application, none represents the petitioner.

The petitioner, by way of this contempt application under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 filed on August 10, 2000, sought for punishment of the alleged contemners/respondents concerned in the writ petition for non-compliance of an order dated May 19, 2000 passed by this court in WP No.2078(W) of 2000.

It appears that since filing of the contempt application, none moved to press it.

I feel that the petitioner is no longer interested to proceed with the application on hand.

Accordingly, the contempt application stands dismissed for non-appearance of the petitioner. [Rabindranath Samanta, J]