Biplab Sarkar @ Biplob Sarkar v. State Of West Bengal

25.08.2025 jb.

jdt.

C.R.M. (M) 675 of 2025 In Re : An Application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure/under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 filed in connection with Airport Police Station Case No.

49/2023 dated 19.11.2023 under Sections 419/420/465/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 14A(b)/14C of the Foreigners Act.

And In Re : Biplab Sarkar @ Biplob Sarkar Mr. Debasis Kar ... For the Petitioner.

Mr. Ranabir Roy Choudhury Ms. Snigdha Saha ... For the State Report submitted by the State is taken on record. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner's name is Durgat Sarkar though he has been arrested as Biplab Sarkar. All the documents produced by the petitioner are in connection with Durgat Sarkar. Though the names of the petitioner's parents appear to be late Ranjit Sarkar and Marani Sarkar in the documents produced by him, learned counsel for the State submits that they are in fact the uncle and aunt of the petitioner and his birth certificate depicts a different name as his father.

There are several anomalies in the documents produced by the petitioner which need to be thrashed out in trial. The petitioner is in custody for more than a year. The prosecution proposes to examine 5 witnesses.

In the event the petitioner is released on bail at this stage, chances of his abscondence cannot be ruled out.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail is rejected at this stage.

Learned trial Court is directed to expedite the trial without granting any unnecessary adjournment to either of the parties.

The application for bail is disposed of.

Case diary be returned.

Urgent certified website copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance with all requisite formalities.

(Suvra Ghosh, J.)