Sk Bablu v. State Of West Bengal

30.06.2022.

15.

Ct.No.28.

as (Allowed) C.R.M. (DB) 2067 of 2022 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Goghat P. S. Case No. 67 of 2022 dated 19.03.2022 under Section 286 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 9(B) II of the Indian Evidence Act and adding Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substance Act.

In the matter of : Sk. Bablu.

.... Petitioner.

Mr. Niladri Sekhar Ghosh, Ms. Srimoyee Mukherjee, Ms. Sompurna Chatterjee, Mr. Sourav Mondal.

...for the Petitioner.

Mr. Saibal Bapuli, ld. A.P.P., Mr. Bibaswan Bhattacharyya.

...for the State.

Heard the learned Counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.

Petitioner is in custody for about 59 days. It is submitted he has been falsely implicated in the instant case. Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

We have considered the materials on record.

Incriminating articles have already been seized. In view of the aforesaid, we are of the opinion further detention of the petitioner for the purpose of investigation is not necessary and he may be granted bail.

Accordingly, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like

amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Arambagh, Hooghly subject to condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the Trial Court without any justifiable cause, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

This application for bail is, thus, disposed of. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)