Byomkesh Chakraborty v. State Of West Bengal And ORS.

08.12.2025 Sl. No.320 NB CRM (R) 59 of 2025 In Re:- An application for cancellation of Anticipatory Bail under Section 483(3) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. And In the matter of: Byomkesh Chakraborty ... petitioner Mr. Amarnath Sukul ...for the petitioner.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits as follows. There were serious allegations of cheating and criminal breach of trust made against the accused. Yet, anticipatory bail was granted merely for the asking. In fact, investigation was also not done properly. A reply to the letter of the advocate of the de facto complainant was not seized. Charge sheet has not been submitted yet.

If investigation is not being done properly, it will be open to the present petitioner being the de facto complainant of the case to bring this to the notice of the Investigating Officer or supply such documents to the Investigating Officer and insist upon the Investigating Officer to issue a receipt for supplying a copy of such document or even bring it to the notice of the Court.

However, considering the nature of allegations as would be evident from a plain reading of the First Information Report and a careful perusal of the order of anticipatory bail passed by the Sessions Judge, Paschim Medinipur on 08.05.2025, I do not find any illegality in the same.

Therefore, the application for cancellation of anticipatory bail is dismissed, however, without any order as to costs.

Urgent Photostat certified copy of this order may be supplied to the parties expeditiously, if applied for.

(Jay Sengupta, J.)