Supriya Mallick(Tupai) v. State Of West Bengal

01.07.2022.

22.

Ct.No.28.

as (Allowed) C.R.M. (DB) 2083 of 2022 In Re:- An application for bail under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in connection with Nabadwip P. S. Case No.182 of 2022 dated 08.05.2022 under Sections 341/323/325/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 25(1B)(a) of the Arms Act and charge sheet submitted under Sections 341/323/325/307/506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

In the matter of : Supriya Mallick (Tupai).

.... Petitioner.

Mr. Kaushik Chowdhury, Ms. Busra Khatun.

...for the Petitioner.

Ms. Amita Gaur, Ms. Bratati Roy Chowdhury, Mr. Atulya Sinha.

...for the State.

Heard the learned Counsels appearing on behalf of the parties.

Petitioner is in custody for about 57 days. He prays for bail.

Learned Advocate for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

We have considered the materials on record. Injuries appearing from the medical papers are not grievous or life threatening. In view of the aforesaid facts and the period of detention suffered by the petitioner i.e. 57 days, we are inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the petitioner shall be released on bail upon furnishing a bond of Rs.10,000/- with two sureties of like amount each, one of whom must be local, to the satisfaction of

the learned Judicial Magistrate, Nabadwip, Nadia subject to condition that the petitioner shall appear before the trial court on every date of hearing until further orders and shall not intimidate witnesses or tamper with evidence in any manner whatsoever.

In the event the petitioner fails to appear before the Trial Court without any justifiable cause, the trial Court shall be at liberty to cancel his bail in accordance with law without further reference to this Court.

This application for bail is, thus, disposed of. (Ananya Bandyopadhyay,J.) (Joymalya Bagchi, J.)